February 17, 2016
How do nonprofit staff and board members hold effective meetings? If a nonprofit doesn’t effectively prepare for a gathering of stakeholders, those attending the meeting can become apprehensive and disengaged fairly quickly. Personnel may even begin to view the event as a waste of their time because it’s disorganized and no actionable outcomes are achieved.
In reality, meetings can be highly productive encounters for everyone involved if attendees take the appropriate steps to prepare for them. Below are 10 tips for nonprofit professionals looking to make their next meeting highly efficient and meaningful. For additional meeting productivity tips, visit HelloFocus.com.
When nonprofit board members come together to discuss issues related to governance and creating a sustainable organization, they should take a structured approach. According to The Fundraising Authority, many nonprofits allow too much room for interpretation while developing an agenda by broadly labeling items as a “fundraising update” or “outstanding issues.” Additionally, it may be worth the board members’ time to review recent fundraising or membership developments as they pertain to governance, and there should be a specific time limit established for each action item.
Part and parcel of a functional nonprofit meeting is keeping it within a reserved time frame. According to Wild Apricot, a software service provider for membership organizations, it’s imperative that meetings begin and finish on time. It not only sets a bad precedent for future gatherings if they routinely begin 5 – 10 minutes late, but also negatively impacts attendees’ perception of the event. In other words, it demonstrates a lack of respect for the members who show up on time. In addition, meetings that run over the allotted limit similarly reflects poorly on the organization. The Fundraising Authority explained board members are volunteers and may have other obligations.
Even the most efficient meeting won’t likely address all nuances of a conflict occurring within a nonprofit organization. As Wild Apricot suggested, limit the talking points surrounding a controversy to a specific priority in order to effectively make progress. For instance, if an association has issues retaining members, don’t attempt to pin down all causes during the span of an hour-long meeting, but rather select on to focus on during the current meeting.
According to Forbes, there aren’t many reasons to bring iPhones or iPads into a meeting. These electronic devices often end up being more of a distraction than a tool that facilitates discussion. There are organizations that have effectively gone paperless and use tablets to distribute agendas ahead of time, but it’s up to the participants to ensure the technology isn’t being abused. From emails to mobile apps, there are a number of ways that meeting attendees can get drawn away from the discussion at hand and not put forth their full effort.
If nonprofits plan meetings haphazardly – for instance, when significant amounts of time elapse between gatherings – it’s likely too many events will occur than can be effectively discussed during a single meeting. Accordingly, Inc. Magazine recommended staying regular with these gatherings. With greater consistency, attendees can anticipate when they can expect to participate.
It’s likely that not all meetings will be pertinent to each staff or board member. As a result, Forbes suggested keeping a keen eye on the individuals invited to the event. The topic for discussion should be directly relevant and applicable to the attendees – otherwise, they’ll likely become alienated because they won’t have anything to add.
Bruce Lesley, senior governance consultant for BoardSource, spoke on a Stanford Graduate School of Business video indicating that there should be a person in charge of enabling discussion. Lesley recommended the board chair is the person for the job, and he or she can facilitate conversations that are interactive. The outcome of the meeting should produce results beyond the contributions of any single attendee.
Nonprofit Quarterly indicated reports serve a definite purpose, but just not as an item to be read during a meeting. It’s understood that meeting attendees can likely read through important reports before the event, but taking up precious minutes during a meeting to read verbatim isn’t an effective use of time. If anything, a report should serve as a spring board for further discussion or for members to ask for clarification if needed.
Any effective agenda is generally accompanied by thorough meeting minutes. They may not be the most exciting part of an active discussion, but they’re often necessary to keep all attendees on the same page, especially in advance of future gatherings.
According to Inc., a meeting should end with sufficient time to review the decisions and outcomes – even five minutes is sufficient.
Working with Marshal Whittey at First Nonprofit has been a great experience. He handles our request as a priority and goes above and beyond to resolve any issues we have in a timely manner. Marshall follows through to the end and ensures our needs are met. He has been a great resource for LSC and our “go to” for any tax questions we may have. With LSC transitioning several facilities into one federal tax identification number, First Nonprofit was able to assist and provide guidance with best practices resolving claims to each entity. Additionally First Nonprofit provided knowledge (information materials) and one on one training to HRS group with best practices to handle claims state adjudicated, fraudulent claims, and appeals. And processing information in the First Nonprofit [unemployment claims] system allows for timely information can be collected.
My experience with FNP has been wonderful. Unemployment in general is quite confusing and FNP has simplified the process for us. Everyone we have reached out to or worked with has been very helpful and follows up to be sure we understand the information. I am so happy we made the switch to FNP!
First Nonprofit smoothed the unemployment perils for our organization during Covid. Without the ability to cap our UI exposure, we would not have been able to weather the storm. The program worked perfectly and we have come out of the pandemic ready to forge on. Thanks FNP!
My experience with the FNP has been fantastic. The idea of setting funds aside for the unemployment tax liability is a bedrock for nonprofit organizations like mine, namely ASHBA; what is even more advantageous is having the FNP as a custodian of those funds. 100% recommended!
I would like to comment on my experience with FNP….to date our District has saved $1,000’s of dollars by being enrolled in the First Nonprofit program. My only regret is that we did not know about this method of paying unemployment tax years ago….as I had figured about five years
ago, had we enrolled 15-20 years ago, we could have saved our small school district upwards of $500,000 in payments to IDES. Also we would have had a pretty hefty sum of money in our Reserve Account. Thankfully I attended a workshop hosted by First Nonprofit back in 2015 which got the ball rolling!
I have worked with the First Non-Profit Team for many years, and I appreciate the quick response and care that Cecilia and the team provides anytime I have questions. While there are other providers that may provide like services, First Nonprofit will always be my first choice! I appreciate you!
First Nonprofit has been easy to work with and makes the administrative process easier and smoother. We enjoy working with you.
Luckily for us, our interactions regarding any issues with staffing has been very minimal! I can say that all other interactions with regards to billing, 941 reporting, etc. have been extremely pleasant, accommodating and easy to work with. Kim Ghanayem is always prompt, professional and friendly. Thank you so much!