October 3, 2013
As states begin to heal from the Great Recession, a side effect from the injections of federal money into state unemployment funds threatens to slow the recovery. When states run out of their own money to fund unemployment, they borrow from the federal government to pay benefits to the unemployed, and then repay the loans out of their own pockets when things improve.
However, many states were unprepared for the increase in unemployment that began in late 2007 and quickly borrowed large amounts. The lack of funding was due to states adopting a "pay-as-you-go" approach that held taxes artificially low when the economy was healthy instead of preparing for recession, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. The increased borrowing now means that employers in cash-strapped states are seeing their unemployment insurance tax rise.
Employers hurt when state fails to pay
Employers in states that fail to fully repay loans within two years are subjected to a yearly increase in federal unemployment tax paid by employers until the loan is repaid. Due to the size and length of the recession, some states now have massive debt obligations that could take years to pay back. North Carolina is one of the many states that was ill-prepared when the recession hit and was left with nearly $2 billion in debt to the federal government.
States will need to reduce unemployment benefits
The state passed legislation in July that has dialed down the length and size of state unemployment benefits, according to News & Observer. While other factors will affect the loan repayment, the changes to North Carolina's unemployment benefits could mean loans are repaid by the end of 2015 instead of 2018.
States that do not follow North Carolina's lead in reducing state unemployment may find themselves hindering their recovery. While federal unemployment tax contributions are low – 0.6 percent of the first $7,000 paid annually to each employee – the yearly increase in that figure until the loan is repaid means more unpredictable costs for employers. To some companies, that liability could be one more reason that increases to their workforce will be placed on hold.
While the effect of that tax increase on hiring numbers is speculative, states have plenty of other reasons for expediting loan repayment. The realization that unemployment programs need to be forward funded means not only paying down the current debt, but shoring up reserves for the future. A state that has liability from the Great Recession when the next downturn hits will find itself in a precarious situation.
To learn how your organization may take action to address these cost increases that pose a new challenge to your organization, complete the information request form on the right.
NYCON members who use First Nonprofit’s programs enjoy enduring savings and improved efficiency. Our association knows that success, because from the beginning, we achieved the same great benefits. Great savings, seamless technology, and responsive service. NYCON highly recommends First Nonprofit’s remarkable unemployment solutions.
We were introduced to First Nonprofit through another housing authority. In our analysis and comparison to what we were paying the State, our first year savings was $5,800 plus. We have been with them since the end of 2008 and I am glad we have been. I consider them an arm of our HR department.
Because INCS advocates for the operating conditions that allow charter public schools to provide high quality public education, partnering with First Nonprofit was an easy decision. First Nonprofit’s unemployment programs provide our member schools two operating elements crucial to their ability to provide high quality public education: savings and budget certainty. Capable, committed teachers are the key to student success. By participating in the unemployment insurance savings plan, charter public schools gain peace of mind and are able to invest more money in their teachers.
Throughout our membership in the Unemployment Savings Program, First Nonprofit understood our demands, community dynamics, and the importance of seamless services; that allowed us to serve our constituents better.